Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Addition under section 69A was sustained where the assessee's statement under section 132(4) was linked to seized material and not rebutted by credible evidence. The Tribunal found this was not a bare confession: the seized document recovered during search provided the incriminating basis, the assessee gave a detailed explanation of the cash loan, source, interest arrangement and proposed recovery, and the statement was not retracted for a long period. The later claim that the figure represented cheque recoveries was held inconsistent with the ledger account, which showed no outstanding receivable on the date of search. The addition was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Addition under section 69A was sustained where the assessee's statement under section 132(4) was linked to seized material and not rebutted by credible evidence. The Tribunal found this was not a bare confession: the seized document recovered during search provided the incriminating basis, the assessee gave a detailed explanation of the cash loan, source, interest arrangement and proposed recovery, and the statement was not retracted for a long period. The later claim that the figure represented cheque recoveries was held inconsistent with the ledger account, which showed no outstanding receivable on the date of search. The addition was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
