CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
NCLAT held that once an application had been permitted to be withdrawn, the tribunal was not required to make further observations affecting the parties' rights. The impugned liberty to run the company according to law and to file a petition under Section 241 went beyond the prayer sought, revived a controversy already concluded or withdrawn in earlier proceedings, and amounted to judicial overreach and relief beyond pleadings. Those observations were therefore quashed, while the parties remained free to pursue any other remedy available in law.
NCLAT held that once an application had been permitted to be withdrawn, the tribunal was not required to make further observations affecting the parties' rights. The impugned liberty to run the company according to law and to file a petition under Section 241 went beyond the prayer sought, revived a controversy already concluded or withdrawn in earlier proceedings, and amounted to judicial overreach and relief beyond pleadings. Those observations were therefore quashed, while the parties remained free to pursue any other remedy available in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
