Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
NCLAT held that once an application had been permitted to be withdrawn, the tribunal was not required to make further observations affecting the parties' rights. The impugned liberty to run the company according to law and to file a petition under Section 241 went beyond the prayer sought, revived a controversy already concluded or withdrawn in earlier proceedings, and amounted to judicial overreach and relief beyond pleadings. Those observations were therefore quashed, while the parties remained free to pursue any other remedy available in law.
NCLAT held that once an application had been permitted to be withdrawn, the tribunal was not required to make further observations affecting the parties' rights. The impugned liberty to run the company according to law and to file a petition under Section 241 went beyond the prayer sought, revived a controversy already concluded or withdrawn in earlier proceedings, and amounted to judicial overreach and relief beyond pleadings. Those observations were therefore quashed, while the parties remained free to pursue any other remedy available in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
