Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
In section 9 insolvency proceedings, the Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority may examine pleadings, agreements, audit material, acknowledgements and communications to determine debt and default, and that such scrutiny does not trespass into civil court jurisdiction. It rejected the argument that the summary nature of section 9 bars a detailed review of the record. On the facts, the agreements and email records contained clear admissions of liability, while the alleged dispute over damaged returned stock was treated as belated and unsupported by any independent suit, arbitration or other adjudicatory proceeding. The appeal was dismissed and admission of the application was upheld.
In section 9 insolvency proceedings, the Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority may examine pleadings, agreements, audit material, acknowledgements and communications to determine debt and default, and that such scrutiny does not trespass into civil court jurisdiction. It rejected the argument that the summary nature of section 9 bars a detailed review of the record. On the facts, the agreements and email records contained clear admissions of liability, while the alleged dispute over damaged returned stock was treated as belated and unsupported by any independent suit, arbitration or other adjudicatory proceeding. The appeal was dismissed and admission of the application was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.