Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Shares held in a demat account were treated as property acquired from proceeds of crime where the appellant, a Data Entry Operator on a modest salary, had received funds from an entity linked to alleged diversion of money and could not substantiate her claim that the transfer was a one-time family medical help. The bank records showed the amount was used to purchase shares of M/s CGPISL, which remained in the demat account. The Appellate Tribunal found no illegality in the provisional attachment merely because the appellant was not named in the FIR and upheld the attachment of the shares. The appeal was dismissed.
Shares held in a demat account were treated as property acquired from proceeds of crime where the appellant, a Data Entry Operator on a modest salary, had received funds from an entity linked to alleged diversion of money and could not substantiate her claim that the transfer was a one-time family medical help. The bank records showed the amount was used to purchase shares of M/s CGPISL, which remained in the demat account. The Appellate Tribunal found no illegality in the provisional attachment merely because the appellant was not named in the FIR and upheld the attachment of the shares. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
