Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Show cause notices issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act were prima facie found vulnerable where the underlying development agreements predated GST and the developer's obligations to hand over flats free of cost had already crystallised. The Court also noted the audit report and the taxpayer's settlement communication, and observed that the commissioner's approach appeared inconsistent with those materials. It therefore recorded a prima facie view that the notices may have been issued without jurisdiction and stayed further proceedings pending final disposal of the writ petition.
Show cause notices issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act were prima facie found vulnerable where the underlying development agreements predated GST and the developer's obligations to hand over flats free of cost had already crystallised. The Court also noted the audit report and the taxpayer's settlement communication, and observed that the commissioner's approach appeared inconsistent with those materials. It therefore recorded a prima facie view that the notices may have been issued without jurisdiction and stayed further proceedings pending final disposal of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.