Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Capital gains under section 50C had to be recomputed by adopting the guideline value as on 03.10.2006, since the Tribunal's view in the co-owner's case was held to reflect the correct legal position and to accord with the cited precedent. The valuation adopted by the Assessing Officer and the Departmental Valuation Officer was therefore not sustained. The Court set aside the orders below and directed fresh computation of capital gains on that basis, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Capital gains under section 50C had to be recomputed by adopting the guideline value as on 03.10.2006, since the Tribunal's view in the co-owner's case was held to reflect the correct legal position and to accord with the cited precedent. The valuation adopted by the Assessing Officer and the Departmental Valuation Officer was therefore not sustained. The Court set aside the orders below and directed fresh computation of capital gains on that basis, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.