Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Capital gains under section 50C had to be recomputed by adopting the guideline value as on 03.10.2006, since the Tribunal's view in the co-owner's case was held to reflect the correct legal position and to accord with the cited precedent. The valuation adopted by the Assessing Officer and the Departmental Valuation Officer was therefore not sustained. The Court set aside the orders below and directed fresh computation of capital gains on that basis, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Capital gains under section 50C had to be recomputed by adopting the guideline value as on 03.10.2006, since the Tribunal's view in the co-owner's case was held to reflect the correct legal position and to accord with the cited precedent. The valuation adopted by the Assessing Officer and the Departmental Valuation Officer was therefore not sustained. The Court set aside the orders below and directed fresh computation of capital gains on that basis, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.