Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Capital gains under section 50C had to be recomputed by adopting the guideline value as on 03.10.2006, since the Tribunal's view in the co-owner's case was held to reflect the correct legal position and to accord with the cited precedent. The valuation adopted by the Assessing Officer and the Departmental Valuation Officer was therefore not sustained. The Court set aside the orders below and directed fresh computation of capital gains on that basis, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Capital gains under section 50C had to be recomputed by adopting the guideline value as on 03.10.2006, since the Tribunal's view in the co-owner's case was held to reflect the correct legal position and to accord with the cited precedent. The valuation adopted by the Assessing Officer and the Departmental Valuation Officer was therefore not sustained. The Court set aside the orders below and directed fresh computation of capital gains on that basis, after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.