Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5321 to 5340 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Inordinate delay in filing the first appeal was condoned because...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the default.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Inordinate delay in filing the first appeal was condoned because the controlling test was the acceptability of the explanation, not the length of delay alone. Applying a liberal construction of "sufficient cause", the Tribunal accepted that multiple pending criminal proceedings and the assessee's confinement in jail were circumstances beyond his control. Refusal to condone would have shut out adjudication on merits, so the dismissal of the appeal on limitation was not sustained. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for disposal on merits after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity.
Inordinate delay in filing the first appeal was condoned because the controlling test was the acceptability of the explanation, not the length of delay alone. Applying a liberal construction of "sufficient cause", the Tribunal accepted that multiple pending criminal proceedings and the assessee's confinement in jail were circumstances beyond his control. Refusal to condone would have shut out adjudication on merits, so the dismissal of the appeal on limitation was not sustained. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for disposal on merits after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.