Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a statutory notice was deleted by the ITAT. The Tribunal noted that the quantum assessment had already been restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration and, although that restoration did not directly determine the non-appearance issue, it considered the assessee's consistent follow-up with the tax authorities in other matters. On that overall conduct and in the interests of justice, the Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal.
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a statutory notice was deleted by the ITAT. The Tribunal noted that the quantum assessment had already been restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration and, although that restoration did not directly determine the non-appearance issue, it considered the assessee's consistent follow-up with the tax authorities in other matters. On that overall conduct and in the interests of justice, the Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
