Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5661 to 5680 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a statutory notice was deleted by the ITAT. The Tribunal noted that the quantum assessment had already been restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration and, although that restoration did not directly determine the non-appearance issue, it considered the assessee's consistent follow-up with the tax authorities in other matters. On that overall conduct and in the interests of justice, the Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal.
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a statutory notice was deleted by the ITAT. The Tribunal noted that the quantum assessment had already been restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration and, although that restoration did not directly determine the non-appearance issue, it considered the assessee's consistent follow-up with the tax authorities in other matters. On that overall conduct and in the interests of justice, the Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.