Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Telescoping was accepted on the basis of surplus funds from earlier assessment years, so the sustained additions for shortage of funds in AY 2000-01 and for undisclosed income and vehicle investment in AY 2002-03 did not survive. For AY 2002-03, the capital gains addition was confined to the assessee's own computation because the higher figure in the appellate order was treated as an inadvertent error. The deduction claim under section 54 was rejected for want of substantiation.
Telescoping was accepted on the basis of surplus funds from earlier assessment years, so the sustained additions for shortage of funds in AY 2000-01 and for undisclosed income and vehicle investment in AY 2002-03 did not survive. For AY 2002-03, the capital gains addition was confined to the assessee's own computation because the higher figure in the appellate order was treated as an inadvertent error. The deduction claim under section 54 was rejected for want of substantiation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
