Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5581 to 5600 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Telescoping was accepted on the basis of surplus funds from earlier assessment years, so the sustained additions for shortage of funds in AY 2000-01 and for undisclosed income and vehicle investment in AY 2002-03 did not survive. For AY 2002-03, the capital gains addition was confined to the assessee's own computation because the higher figure in the appellate order was treated as an inadvertent error. The deduction claim under section 54 was rejected for want of substantiation.
Telescoping was accepted on the basis of surplus funds from earlier assessment years, so the sustained additions for shortage of funds in AY 2000-01 and for undisclosed income and vehicle investment in AY 2002-03 did not survive. For AY 2002-03, the capital gains addition was confined to the assessee's own computation because the higher figure in the appellate order was treated as an inadvertent error. The deduction claim under section 54 was rejected for want of substantiation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
