Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Composite construction contracts were taxable, if at all, as works contract service because the disputed periods fell after that service was introduced and the activities were executed as works contracts. Demands raised under commercial or industrial construction service and construction of complex service were therefore unsustainable and were set aside. On valuation, the appellant was entitled to 67% abatement for works contracts, and the value of free-supplied materials had to be deducted from the taxable value. The Department's attempt to deny abatement on the full receipts, including VAT-paid goods, was rejected, and the resulting tax demands were held unsustainable.
Composite construction contracts were taxable, if at all, as works contract service because the disputed periods fell after that service was introduced and the activities were executed as works contracts. Demands raised under commercial or industrial construction service and construction of complex service were therefore unsustainable and were set aside. On valuation, the appellant was entitled to 67% abatement for works contracts, and the value of free-supplied materials had to be deducted from the taxable value. The Department's attempt to deny abatement on the full receipts, including VAT-paid goods, was rejected, and the resulting tax demands were held unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.