Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Event management activity involving planning and organising weddings, exhibitions and similar events was treated as taxable Event Management Service. For valuation, only the commission retained by the appellant could form part of the assessable value; amounts collected merely for payment to third-party vendors were excluded, so the demand on gross receipts failed. Loose papers, uncertified computer printouts and uncorroborated statements were held insufficient to prove clandestine transactions, and the burden remained on the Revenue. The extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked for want of proof of suppression or intent to evade, and the proceedings, including penalties, were set aside as time-barred.
Event management activity involving planning and organising weddings, exhibitions and similar events was treated as taxable Event Management Service. For valuation, only the commission retained by the appellant could form part of the assessable value; amounts collected merely for payment to third-party vendors were excluded, so the demand on gross receipts failed. Loose papers, uncertified computer printouts and uncorroborated statements were held insufficient to prove clandestine transactions, and the burden remained on the Revenue. The extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked for want of proof of suppression or intent to evade, and the proceedings, including penalties, were set aside as time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
