Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Event management activity involving planning and organising weddings, exhibitions and similar events was treated as taxable Event Management Service. For valuation, only the commission retained by the appellant could form part of the assessable value; amounts collected merely for payment to third-party vendors were excluded, so the demand on gross receipts failed. Loose papers, uncertified computer printouts and uncorroborated statements were held insufficient to prove clandestine transactions, and the burden remained on the Revenue. The extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked for want of proof of suppression or intent to evade, and the proceedings, including penalties, were set aside as time-barred.
Event management activity involving planning and organising weddings, exhibitions and similar events was treated as taxable Event Management Service. For valuation, only the commission retained by the appellant could form part of the assessable value; amounts collected merely for payment to third-party vendors were excluded, so the demand on gross receipts failed. Loose papers, uncertified computer printouts and uncorroborated statements were held insufficient to prove clandestine transactions, and the burden remained on the Revenue. The extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked for want of proof of suppression or intent to evade, and the proceedings, including penalties, were set aside as time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.