Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Before invoking Chapter X transfer pricing provisions, the assessee contended that the Assessing Officer must first establish that the alleged income arises from an international transaction chargeable to tax in India, including under the DTAA, and that the reference to the TPO without such determination was jurisdictionally defective. The Revenue sought time to reply, and the Court directed filing of an affidavit in reply and listed the matter for ad-interim relief. Pending disposal of the writ petition, the Court granted ad-interim stay of the show cause notice, impugned order, reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer, and the assessment proceedings, without prejudice to the parties' rights and contentions.
Before invoking Chapter X transfer pricing provisions, the assessee contended that the Assessing Officer must first establish that the alleged income arises from an international transaction chargeable to tax in India, including under the DTAA, and that the reference to the TPO without such determination was jurisdictionally defective. The Revenue sought time to reply, and the Court directed filing of an affidavit in reply and listed the matter for ad-interim relief. Pending disposal of the writ petition, the Court granted ad-interim stay of the show cause notice, impugned order, reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer, and the assessment proceedings, without prejudice to the parties' rights and contentions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
