Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In search assessments under section 153A, additions cannot be made for completed or unabated assessment years unless incriminating material is found during the search. The High Court noted that this principle applies equally whether the earlier assessment was processed under section 143(1) or completed under section 143(3). As the Revenue did not dispute the absence of incriminating material and the Tribunal had deleted the additions on that basis, the Court found no error in the order and rejected the appeals.
In search assessments under section 153A, additions cannot be made for completed or unabated assessment years unless incriminating material is found during the search. The High Court noted that this principle applies equally whether the earlier assessment was processed under section 143(1) or completed under section 143(3). As the Revenue did not dispute the absence of incriminating material and the Tribunal had deleted the additions on that basis, the Court found no error in the order and rejected the appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.