Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
In search assessments under section 153A, additions cannot be made for completed or unabated assessment years unless incriminating material is found during the search. The High Court noted that this principle applies equally whether the earlier assessment was processed under section 143(1) or completed under section 143(3). As the Revenue did not dispute the absence of incriminating material and the Tribunal had deleted the additions on that basis, the Court found no error in the order and rejected the appeals.
In search assessments under section 153A, additions cannot be made for completed or unabated assessment years unless incriminating material is found during the search. The High Court noted that this principle applies equally whether the earlier assessment was processed under section 143(1) or completed under section 143(3). As the Revenue did not dispute the absence of incriminating material and the Tribunal had deleted the additions on that basis, the Court found no error in the order and rejected the appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.