Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mandatory statutory transfers of funds to the Central Government under section 23(2) of the Exim Act were treated as not constituting dividend, so section 115-O dividend distribution tax did not apply. The Tribunal followed its coordinate bench decision in the assessee's own later years, noted that the Revenue showed no change in facts or law, and upheld deletion of the tax demand. The Revenue's appeals for all years were dismissed.
Mandatory statutory transfers of funds to the Central Government under section 23(2) of the Exim Act were treated as not constituting dividend, so section 115-O dividend distribution tax did not apply. The Tribunal followed its coordinate bench decision in the assessee's own later years, noted that the Revenue showed no change in facts or law, and upheld deletion of the tax demand. The Revenue's appeals for all years were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.