Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A reassessment opened to tax long-term capital gains from a joint development agreement could also entertain a section 54F claim directly linked to that escaped income, because reassessment is not a review of concluded matters but relief bearing on the very income under examination. The Tribunal further held that a landowner's agreed share of residential units to be constructed and allotted by the developer can qualify as investment in construction of a residential house for section 54F purposes, following Karnataka High Court authorities. The exemption claim was therefore restored for fresh adjudication on the remaining statutory conditions.
A reassessment opened to tax long-term capital gains from a joint development agreement could also entertain a section 54F claim directly linked to that escaped income, because reassessment is not a review of concluded matters but relief bearing on the very income under examination. The Tribunal further held that a landowner's agreed share of residential units to be constructed and allotted by the developer can qualify as investment in construction of a residential house for section 54F purposes, following Karnataka High Court authorities. The exemption claim was therefore restored for fresh adjudication on the remaining statutory conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
