Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A reassessment opened to tax long-term capital gains from a joint development agreement could also entertain a section 54F claim directly linked to that escaped income, because reassessment is not a review of concluded matters but relief bearing on the very income under examination. The Tribunal further held that a landowner's agreed share of residential units to be constructed and allotted by the developer can qualify as investment in construction of a residential house for section 54F purposes, following Karnataka High Court authorities. The exemption claim was therefore restored for fresh adjudication on the remaining statutory conditions.
A reassessment opened to tax long-term capital gains from a joint development agreement could also entertain a section 54F claim directly linked to that escaped income, because reassessment is not a review of concluded matters but relief bearing on the very income under examination. The Tribunal further held that a landowner's agreed share of residential units to be constructed and allotted by the developer can qualify as investment in construction of a residential house for section 54F purposes, following Karnataka High Court authorities. The exemption claim was therefore restored for fresh adjudication on the remaining statutory conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
