Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
A reassessment opened to tax long-term capital gains from a joint development agreement could also entertain a section 54F claim directly linked to that escaped income, because reassessment is not a review of concluded matters but relief bearing on the very income under examination. The Tribunal further held that a landowner's agreed share of residential units to be constructed and allotted by the developer can qualify as investment in construction of a residential house for section 54F purposes, following Karnataka High Court authorities. The exemption claim was therefore restored for fresh adjudication on the remaining statutory conditions.
A reassessment opened to tax long-term capital gains from a joint development agreement could also entertain a section 54F claim directly linked to that escaped income, because reassessment is not a review of concluded matters but relief bearing on the very income under examination. The Tribunal further held that a landowner's agreed share of residential units to be constructed and allotted by the developer can qualify as investment in construction of a residential house for section 54F purposes, following Karnataka High Court authorities. The exemption claim was therefore restored for fresh adjudication on the remaining statutory conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
