Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 54F relief was available because the Millennium Plaza property was treated as an office space and therefore a commercial property, not a residential house; the assessee was regarded as having only one residential house, so denial of the exemption had no basis. Even if the new asset at Parsvanath Exotica was transferred later, section 54F(3) affects taxation of the exempted capital gain in the year of transfer of the new asset and does not justify of the exemption in the year it was otherwise allowable. Agricultural receipts, including lease rent from agricultural land used for saplings and plantations, were also accepted as agricultural income because the assessee had supporting material and similar treatment had been accepted in earlier years and in connected precedent.
Section 54F relief was available because the Millennium Plaza property was treated as an office space and therefore a commercial property, not a residential house; the assessee was regarded as having only one residential house, so denial of the exemption had no basis. Even if the new asset at Parsvanath Exotica was transferred later, section 54F(3) affects taxation of the exempted capital gain in the year of transfer of the new asset and does not justify of the exemption in the year it was otherwise allowable. Agricultural receipts, including lease rent from agricultural land used for saplings and plantations, were also accepted as agricultural income because the assessee had supporting material and similar treatment had been accepted in earlier years and in connected precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.