Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
After the 01-04-2016 amendment, weighted deduction for in-house R&D under section 35(2AB) was confined to the expenditure quantified by the DSIR in Form 3CL, and the Assessing Officer could not allow a higher amount. MEIS receipts treated as capital receipts were not liable to addition in book profit under section 115JB unless they fell within the specific Explanation 1 adjustments, and a capital receipt not debited to profit and loss could not be added merely because of accounting treatment. Loss on investment in a wholly owned subsidiary was treated as business loss where the investment was made on commercial expediency to further business operations. Both the assessee's and Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
After the 01-04-2016 amendment, weighted deduction for in-house R&D under section 35(2AB) was confined to the expenditure quantified by the DSIR in Form 3CL, and the Assessing Officer could not allow a higher amount. MEIS receipts treated as capital receipts were not liable to addition in book profit under section 115JB unless they fell within the specific Explanation 1 adjustments, and a capital receipt not debited to profit and loss could not be added merely because of accounting treatment. Loss on investment in a wholly owned subsidiary was treated as business loss where the investment was made on commercial expediency to further business operations. Both the assessee's and Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.