Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A seized photocopy of an agreement to sell was treated as reliable incriminating material where it was signed on every page, witnessed, and matched the subsequent registered sale deeds on consideration details, cheque particulars and witness identity; the Tribunal held that no further independent corroboration was required and sustained the addition for under-reported sale consideration. For penalty, it held that cash paid at the time of execution of a registered sale deed is distinct from the advance or specified sum targeted by the amended section 269SS, which was intended to curb cash advances in real-estate transactions; on that basis, penalty under section 271D was deleted.
A seized photocopy of an agreement to sell was treated as reliable incriminating material where it was signed on every page, witnessed, and matched the subsequent registered sale deeds on consideration details, cheque particulars and witness identity; the Tribunal held that no further independent corroboration was required and sustained the addition for under-reported sale consideration. For penalty, it held that cash paid at the time of execution of a registered sale deed is distinct from the advance or specified sum targeted by the amended section 269SS, which was intended to curb cash advances in real-estate transactions; on that basis, penalty under section 271D was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
