International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
ISO certification was only a procedural relaxation for waiver of...
ISO certification is only procedural for export schemes; substantive DFIA and Advance Authorisation benefits survived on test reports and no diversion.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ISO certification was only a procedural relaxation for waiver of departmental sampling, not an independent condition for DFIA or Advance Authorisation benefits. Where export samples were drawn by the department, test reports were available, export obligation was fulfilled, and there was no allegation or finding of diversion of imported inputs, the Tribunal held that non-compliance with the ISO requirement could not defeat substantive export benefits or support a presumption of SION mismatch. The duty demand and interest were therefore unsustainable, and confiscation, penalties, and invocation of the extended period were set aside for want of evidence of diversion, misdeclaration, or personal involvement.
ISO certification was only a procedural relaxation for waiver of departmental sampling, not an independent condition for DFIA or Advance Authorisation benefits. Where export samples were drawn by the department, test reports were available, export obligation was fulfilled, and there was no allegation or finding of diversion of imported inputs, the Tribunal held that non-compliance with the ISO requirement could not defeat substantive export benefits or support a presumption of SION mismatch. The duty demand and interest were therefore unsustainable, and confiscation, penalties, and invocation of the extended period were set aside for want of evidence of diversion, misdeclaration, or personal involvement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.