Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
NCLAT directed release of the fixed deposit maintained with its Registry, together with accrued interest, to the financial creditor after removal of the lien. The Tribunal held that its earlier order had left the treatment of the deposited amount to the Adjudicating Authority's order on the Section 12A settlement application. As the Adjudicating Authority had allowed the settlement, dismissed the insolvency petition as withdrawn, and specifically directed that the Registry-held amount be received by the financial creditor under the settlement agreement, that direction was binding. In the absence of any objection from the original appellant, the application for release was allowed.
NCLAT directed release of the fixed deposit maintained with its Registry, together with accrued interest, to the financial creditor after removal of the lien. The Tribunal held that its earlier order had left the treatment of the deposited amount to the Adjudicating Authority's order on the Section 12A settlement application. As the Adjudicating Authority had allowed the settlement, dismissed the insolvency petition as withdrawn, and specifically directed that the Registry-held amount be received by the financial creditor under the settlement agreement, that direction was binding. In the absence of any objection from the original appellant, the application for release was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.