Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
NCLAT directed release of the fixed deposit maintained with its Registry, together with accrued interest, to the financial creditor after removal of the lien. The Tribunal held that its earlier order had left the treatment of the deposited amount to the Adjudicating Authority's order on the Section 12A settlement application. As the Adjudicating Authority had allowed the settlement, dismissed the insolvency petition as withdrawn, and specifically directed that the Registry-held amount be received by the financial creditor under the settlement agreement, that direction was binding. In the absence of any objection from the original appellant, the application for release was allowed.
NCLAT directed release of the fixed deposit maintained with its Registry, together with accrued interest, to the financial creditor after removal of the lien. The Tribunal held that its earlier order had left the treatment of the deposited amount to the Adjudicating Authority's order on the Section 12A settlement application. As the Adjudicating Authority had allowed the settlement, dismissed the insolvency petition as withdrawn, and specifically directed that the Registry-held amount be received by the financial creditor under the settlement agreement, that direction was binding. In the absence of any objection from the original appellant, the application for release was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.