Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
NCLAT directed release of the fixed deposit maintained with its Registry, together with accrued interest, to the financial creditor after removal of the lien. The Tribunal held that its earlier order had left the treatment of the deposited amount to the Adjudicating Authority's order on the Section 12A settlement application. As the Adjudicating Authority had allowed the settlement, dismissed the insolvency petition as withdrawn, and specifically directed that the Registry-held amount be received by the financial creditor under the settlement agreement, that direction was binding. In the absence of any objection from the original appellant, the application for release was allowed.
NCLAT directed release of the fixed deposit maintained with its Registry, together with accrued interest, to the financial creditor after removal of the lien. The Tribunal held that its earlier order had left the treatment of the deposited amount to the Adjudicating Authority's order on the Section 12A settlement application. As the Adjudicating Authority had allowed the settlement, dismissed the insolvency petition as withdrawn, and specifically directed that the Registry-held amount be received by the financial creditor under the settlement agreement, that direction was binding. In the absence of any objection from the original appellant, the application for release was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.