Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A before constitution of the CoC may be considered through the IRP, with the adjudicating authority examining statutory requirements, settlement terms and CIRP costs, and may also exercise inherent powers under Rule 11. An unadmitted claimant has no crystallised right to participate in or object to the withdrawal merely because a claim has been filed. Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Glas Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the withdrawal order as within jurisdiction and in accordance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A, while leaving the claimant free to pursue other remedies in law.
Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A before constitution of the CoC may be considered through the IRP, with the adjudicating authority examining statutory requirements, settlement terms and CIRP costs, and may also exercise inherent powers under Rule 11. An unadmitted claimant has no crystallised right to participate in or object to the withdrawal merely because a claim has been filed. Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Glas Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the withdrawal order as within jurisdiction and in accordance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A, while leaving the claimant free to pursue other remedies in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
