Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A before constitution of the CoC may be considered through the IRP, with the adjudicating authority examining statutory requirements, settlement terms and CIRP costs, and may also exercise inherent powers under Rule 11. An unadmitted claimant has no crystallised right to participate in or object to the withdrawal merely because a claim has been filed. Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Glas Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the withdrawal order as within jurisdiction and in accordance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A, while leaving the claimant free to pursue other remedies in law.
Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A before constitution of the CoC may be considered through the IRP, with the adjudicating authority examining statutory requirements, settlement terms and CIRP costs, and may also exercise inherent powers under Rule 11. An unadmitted claimant has no crystallised right to participate in or object to the withdrawal merely because a claim has been filed. Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Glas Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the withdrawal order as within jurisdiction and in accordance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A, while leaving the claimant free to pursue other remedies in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
