Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A before constitution of the CoC may be considered through the IRP, with the adjudicating authority examining statutory requirements, settlement terms and CIRP costs, and may also exercise inherent powers under Rule 11. An unadmitted claimant has no crystallised right to participate in or object to the withdrawal merely because a claim has been filed. Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Glas Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the withdrawal order as within jurisdiction and in accordance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A, while leaving the claimant free to pursue other remedies in law.
Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A before constitution of the CoC may be considered through the IRP, with the adjudicating authority examining statutory requirements, settlement terms and CIRP costs, and may also exercise inherent powers under Rule 11. An unadmitted claimant has no crystallised right to participate in or object to the withdrawal merely because a claim has been filed. Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Glas Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the withdrawal order as within jurisdiction and in accordance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A, while leaving the claimant free to pursue other remedies in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
