Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Reimbursements of wages paid to field consultants were held not includible in taxable value where they were mere pass-through amounts and tax had already been discharged on the service charge; the related demand was set aside. Diesel supplied under separate contracts was treated as a goods transaction, not part of the service value, so service tax on that component was unsustainable. Supply of soil by unit-based work order was not site formation service because it did not involve preparatory site activity. A demand based only on mismatch between ST-3 returns and balance sheet failed for want of evidence, and extended limitation was rejected as suppression was not proved. The demand, interest and penalties were set aside.
Reimbursements of wages paid to field consultants were held not includible in taxable value where they were mere pass-through amounts and tax had already been discharged on the service charge; the related demand was set aside. Diesel supplied under separate contracts was treated as a goods transaction, not part of the service value, so service tax on that component was unsustainable. Supply of soil by unit-based work order was not site formation service because it did not involve preparatory site activity. A demand based only on mismatch between ST-3 returns and balance sheet failed for want of evidence, and extended limitation was rejected as suppression was not proved. The demand, interest and penalties were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.