Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Release of goods under section 129(1)(a) was unavailable where the supplier did not produce an e-way bill or any genuine prescribed documents. The High Court treated the absence of statutory transport documents as sufficient to justify detention and refused release of the goods, and the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP challenging that view. The text also notes issues concerning suspension of registration, prohibition on taxable supply, validity of a tax invoice during suspension, and the requirement to generate an e-way bill by the supplier, recipient or owner.
Release of goods under section 129(1)(a) was unavailable where the supplier did not produce an e-way bill or any genuine prescribed documents. The High Court treated the absence of statutory transport documents as sufficient to justify detention and refused release of the goods, and the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP challenging that view. The text also notes issues concerning suspension of registration, prohibition on taxable supply, validity of a tax invoice during suspension, and the requirement to generate an e-way bill by the supplier, recipient or owner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.