Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Premature recovery from an electronic credit ledger was restrained where the ledger was debited before expiry of the appeal period and before the statutory recovery period under Section 78 had run. The Court held that recovery could not commence until three months after service of the order, unless recorded reasons justified curtailment under the proviso to Section 78. Finding no such reasons, and noting that similar petitions had already received interim protection, the Court granted interim relief by staying the appellate order, directing re-credit of the debited amount, and restraining further recovery.
Premature recovery from an electronic credit ledger was restrained where the ledger was debited before expiry of the appeal period and before the statutory recovery period under Section 78 had run. The Court held that recovery could not commence until three months after service of the order, unless recorded reasons justified curtailment under the proviso to Section 78. Finding no such reasons, and noting that similar petitions had already received interim protection, the Court granted interim relief by staying the appellate order, directing re-credit of the debited amount, and restraining further recovery.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.