Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Canteen recoveries from employees were treated as taxable consideration: the AAR held that the employer's provision of a canteen was ancillary to its business, and the salary deduction represented payment for a separate supply by the employer to employees, so GST was payable on the amount recovered. Input tax credit on GST charged by the canteen contractor was denied because the inward supply was restaurant service taxable at the notified concessional rate without input tax credit, which could not be overridden by the general ITC provision. Notice pay recovery was held not taxable, because it was a deterrent for premature exit rather than consideration for tolerating an act, and the employee received nothing in return.
Canteen recoveries from employees were treated as taxable consideration: the AAR held that the employer's provision of a canteen was ancillary to its business, and the salary deduction represented payment for a separate supply by the employer to employees, so GST was payable on the amount recovered. Input tax credit on GST charged by the canteen contractor was denied because the inward supply was restaurant service taxable at the notified concessional rate without input tax credit, which could not be overridden by the general ITC provision. Notice pay recovery was held not taxable, because it was a deterrent for premature exit rather than consideration for tolerating an act, and the employee received nothing in return.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.