Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6801 to 6820 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A proposed mixture of vegetable oils marketed as "Pooja Oil" and labelled "Not for Human Consumption" was classified under Chapter Heading 1518 because headings 15.07 to 15.15 cover single oils, heading 15.16 applies only to chemically transformed products, and heading 15.17 is limited to edible mixtures. The Authority treated the declared non-human use and marketing description as decisive, and rejected theoretical edibility as irrelevant. On that classification, the product fell within Entry No. 96 of Schedule I of Notification No. 9/2025-Central Tax (Rate) and was taxable at 5%, comprising 2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST.
A proposed mixture of vegetable oils marketed as "Pooja Oil" and labelled "Not for Human Consumption" was classified under Chapter Heading 1518 because headings 15.07 to 15.15 cover single oils, heading 15.16 applies only to chemically transformed products, and heading 15.17 is limited to edible mixtures. The Authority treated the declared non-human use and marketing description as decisive, and rejected theoretical edibility as irrelevant. On that classification, the product fell within Entry No. 96 of Schedule I of Notification No. 9/2025-Central Tax (Rate) and was taxable at 5%, comprising 2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.