Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Limitation for search assessments under a joint warrant was required to be computed person-wise under section 153B read with section 292CC, so the last panchanama in another person's case could not extend time for the assessee; the assessments completed after the statutory period were quashed. Additions based on third-party emails, loose sheets, WhatsApp chats and other electronic material were deleted because the Department failed to prove ownership, nexus, fund flow or corroboration. Estimated commission on alleged bogus sub-contracts and cash-repass theories also failed for want of supporting evidence and cross-examination. Deduction under section 80IA(4) for infrastructure work was upheld on binding precedent.
Limitation for search assessments under a joint warrant was required to be computed person-wise under section 153B read with section 292CC, so the last panchanama in another person's case could not extend time for the assessee; the assessments completed after the statutory period were quashed. Additions based on third-party emails, loose sheets, WhatsApp chats and other electronic material were deleted because the Department failed to prove ownership, nexus, fund flow or corroboration. Estimated commission on alleged bogus sub-contracts and cash-repass theories also failed for want of supporting evidence and cross-examination. Deduction under section 80IA(4) for infrastructure work was upheld on binding precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
