Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Employer's PF/ESI contribution was distinguished from employees' contribution under Checkmate Services: deduction remains available under section 43B if payment is made before the return-filing due date, so the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the deposit date and allow the claim if timely paid. The Tribunal also accepted the claim for refund of excess Dividend Distribution Tax, applying the India-Japan DTAA and the principle that a more beneficial treaty rate overrides the domestic rate; any tax paid in excess of the treaty rate was held refundable, with the exact amount to be computed by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was partly allowed.
Employer's PF/ESI contribution was distinguished from employees' contribution under Checkmate Services: deduction remains available under section 43B if payment is made before the return-filing due date, so the Assessing Officer was directed to verify the deposit date and allow the claim if timely paid. The Tribunal also accepted the claim for refund of excess Dividend Distribution Tax, applying the India-Japan DTAA and the principle that a more beneficial treaty rate overrides the domestic rate; any tax paid in excess of the treaty rate was held refundable, with the exact amount to be computed by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.