Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Default was proved only for the overdue quarterly interest demanded in the cure notice, not for the full debenture principal, because the principal became payable only on 30.06.2024 and no further redemption demand was issued before the Section 7 filing; later payments did not erase the subsisting default on the filing date. The view that real estate insolvency can never be project-wise was rejected as contrary to binding precedent, and the process was required to proceed on a project-specific basis unless circumstances justify otherwise. On construction of the debenture trust deed, the financing and security package were held to be tied to Project Aspirations on the identified land, so the CIRP was confined to that project and not extended to the debtor's other projects.
Default was proved only for the overdue quarterly interest demanded in the cure notice, not for the full debenture principal, because the principal became payable only on 30.06.2024 and no further redemption demand was issued before the Section 7 filing; later payments did not erase the subsisting default on the filing date. The view that real estate insolvency can never be project-wise was rejected as contrary to binding precedent, and the process was required to proceed on a project-specific basis unless circumstances justify otherwise. On construction of the debenture trust deed, the financing and security package were held to be tied to Project Aspirations on the identified land, so the CIRP was confined to that project and not extended to the debtor's other projects.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
