Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
GST budgetary support under Notification No. 20/2007 was examined in light of the 22-02-2023 clarification and the earlier coordinate Bench view on similarly situated units. The Court noted that the exemption applied to units commencing commercial production by 31-03-2017 and that the petitioner's eligibility certificate reflected commencement after modernization from 30-03-2017. As the respondents did not dispute the coordinate Bench position, the Court did not decide entitlement on merits and instead directed verification of whether the petitioner stood on the same footing as the units covered by M/s Sai Enterprises and analogous matters. If parity is confirmed, the corresponding benefits are to be extended.
GST budgetary support under Notification No. 20/2007 was examined in light of the 22-02-2023 clarification and the earlier coordinate Bench view on similarly situated units. The Court noted that the exemption applied to units commencing commercial production by 31-03-2017 and that the petitioner's eligibility certificate reflected commencement after modernization from 30-03-2017. As the respondents did not dispute the coordinate Bench position, the Court did not decide entitlement on merits and instead directed verification of whether the petitioner stood on the same footing as the units covered by M/s Sai Enterprises and analogous matters. If parity is confirmed, the corresponding benefits are to be extended.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
