Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Assessment under section 147 read with section 144B was not vitiated merely because notice under section 143(2) was issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and the reassessment was completed through the faceless regime; the Tribunal held that concurrent jurisdiction survives and rejected the legal challenge. On merits, however, additions based on treating full sale consideration as short-term capital gain, ad hoc estimation of contract and professional receipts, and addition of rent receipts as business income were set aside because they were made without proper verification of cost, books, reconciliation, or supporting documents. The matter was remanded for fresh examination, with the assessee's non-compliance noted as a material factor.
Assessment under section 147 read with section 144B was not vitiated merely because notice under section 143(2) was issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and the reassessment was completed through the faceless regime; the Tribunal held that concurrent jurisdiction survives and rejected the legal challenge. On merits, however, additions based on treating full sale consideration as short-term capital gain, ad hoc estimation of contract and professional receipts, and addition of rent receipts as business income were set aside because they were made without proper verification of cost, books, reconciliation, or supporting documents. The matter was remanded for fresh examination, with the assessee's non-compliance noted as a material factor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
