Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
AMOLED display assembly imported for cellular mobile phones was classified under tariff item 85249220 as an OLED flat panel display module, not under tariff item 85177990 as parts of heading 8517. The Authority applied the terms of the competing headings, Chapter 85 Note 7, HSN Explanatory Notes and Section XVI Note 2(a), holding that modules remain classifiable as display modules even where they include driver or control circuits needed for display operation. The exclusion for modules with video-converting components was found inapplicable because the applicant did not show that the goods contained sophisticated signal-processing components giving them the character of another heading. The specific OLED entry therefore prevailed over a residual parts classification.
AMOLED display assembly imported for cellular mobile phones was classified under tariff item 85249220 as an OLED flat panel display module, not under tariff item 85177990 as parts of heading 8517. The Authority applied the terms of the competing headings, Chapter 85 Note 7, HSN Explanatory Notes and Section XVI Note 2(a), holding that modules remain classifiable as display modules even where they include driver or control circuits needed for display operation. The exclusion for modules with video-converting components was found inapplicable because the applicant did not show that the goods contained sophisticated signal-processing components giving them the character of another heading. The specific OLED entry therefore prevailed over a residual parts classification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
