Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
A pre-CIRP concession agreement that had already been terminated could not be compelled to revive through an approved resolution plan or a later implementation order, because it no longer formed part of the CIRP estate in a manner permitting such direction. The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority had exceeded its permissible scope by directing the appellant, who was not a CIRP participant, to act on the plan insofar as it required revival of the agreement. The order was modified to remove any such direction, while the parties were left free to pursue conciliation or arbitration in accordance with law.
A pre-CIRP concession agreement that had already been terminated could not be compelled to revive through an approved resolution plan or a later implementation order, because it no longer formed part of the CIRP estate in a manner permitting such direction. The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority had exceeded its permissible scope by directing the appellant, who was not a CIRP participant, to act on the plan insofar as it required revival of the agreement. The order was modified to remove any such direction, while the parties were left free to pursue conciliation or arbitration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
