Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
A pre-CIRP concession agreement that had already been terminated could not be compelled to revive through an approved resolution plan or a later implementation order, because it no longer formed part of the CIRP estate in a manner permitting such direction. The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority had exceeded its permissible scope by directing the appellant, who was not a CIRP participant, to act on the plan insofar as it required revival of the agreement. The order was modified to remove any such direction, while the parties were left free to pursue conciliation or arbitration in accordance with law.
A pre-CIRP concession agreement that had already been terminated could not be compelled to revive through an approved resolution plan or a later implementation order, because it no longer formed part of the CIRP estate in a manner permitting such direction. The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority had exceeded its permissible scope by directing the appellant, who was not a CIRP participant, to act on the plan insofar as it required revival of the agreement. The order was modified to remove any such direction, while the parties were left free to pursue conciliation or arbitration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
