Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
NCLAT held that a Section 65 challenge requires pleadings and material showing fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP, and that a grievance over non-issuance of NOC, without more, does not meet that threshold. The homebuyers' complaint was confined to prejudice in obtaining possession and conveyance, but the Tribunal found no cogent material indicating that the Section 7 process was filed for a purpose other than insolvency resolution. As the NOC issue arose after default, it could not invalidate or obstruct the insolvency proceedings. The rejection of the Section 65 application was therefore affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
NCLAT held that a Section 65 challenge requires pleadings and material showing fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP, and that a grievance over non-issuance of NOC, without more, does not meet that threshold. The homebuyers' complaint was confined to prejudice in obtaining possession and conveyance, but the Tribunal found no cogent material indicating that the Section 7 process was filed for a purpose other than insolvency resolution. As the NOC issue arose after default, it could not invalidate or obstruct the insolvency proceedings. The rejection of the Section 65 application was therefore affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.