Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT held that a Section 65 challenge requires pleadings and material showing fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP, and that a grievance over non-issuance of NOC, without more, does not meet that threshold. The homebuyers' complaint was confined to prejudice in obtaining possession and conveyance, but the Tribunal found no cogent material indicating that the Section 7 process was filed for a purpose other than insolvency resolution. As the NOC issue arose after default, it could not invalidate or obstruct the insolvency proceedings. The rejection of the Section 65 application was therefore affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
NCLAT held that a Section 65 challenge requires pleadings and material showing fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP, and that a grievance over non-issuance of NOC, without more, does not meet that threshold. The homebuyers' complaint was confined to prejudice in obtaining possession and conveyance, but the Tribunal found no cogent material indicating that the Section 7 process was filed for a purpose other than insolvency resolution. As the NOC issue arose after default, it could not invalidate or obstruct the insolvency proceedings. The rejection of the Section 65 application was therefore affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.