Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT held that a Section 65 challenge requires pleadings and material showing fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP, and that a grievance over non-issuance of NOC, without more, does not meet that threshold. The homebuyers' complaint was confined to prejudice in obtaining possession and conveyance, but the Tribunal found no cogent material indicating that the Section 7 process was filed for a purpose other than insolvency resolution. As the NOC issue arose after default, it could not invalidate or obstruct the insolvency proceedings. The rejection of the Section 65 application was therefore affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
NCLAT held that a Section 65 challenge requires pleadings and material showing fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP, and that a grievance over non-issuance of NOC, without more, does not meet that threshold. The homebuyers' complaint was confined to prejudice in obtaining possession and conveyance, but the Tribunal found no cogent material indicating that the Section 7 process was filed for a purpose other than insolvency resolution. As the NOC issue arose after default, it could not invalidate or obstruct the insolvency proceedings. The rejection of the Section 65 application was therefore affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
